Integration Modernization Series Part 2: The Disruptor

In the second post in our Digital Transformation series, we feature an innovative company embracing Digital Transformation as they try to become the disruptor in their industry.

This post is the second of our three-part series, “Why Integration Modernization is Essential for Digital Transformation.”  See our other posts: Part 1, “Understanding Digital Transformation,” and Part 3, “Implementing Modern Integration.”   

In the first article of this series, Understanding Digital Transformation, we used the examples of Kodak and Xerox; two companies where digital technologies proved devastating. Both struggled to step away from their legacy business while at the same time trying to understand and apply the new technology. Most importantly, leadership struggled to think differently and apply the capabilities to new business models.

Digital Transformation

For other companies, Digital Transformation is viewed as an opportunity. Let’s explore an example of a company embracing Digital Transformation as they try to become the disruptor in their industry.  

For the last fifteen years, we have been the enterprise integration partner for Moog, another Western NY company. Moog is a leader in the design and manufacture of motion control systems for the aerospace industry and industrial equipment manufacturers around the world.

The Aircraft Group, for example, makes actuators and systems for primary flight and jet engine controls for the commercial and military markets. I often think of Moog as I look out over the wing of the aircraft I’m riding.

Since 2004, Moog has been investigating 3D printing or Additive Manufacturing (AM). The technology makes it possible for a laser and Titanium (or other metal) powder to “print” high quality, intricate, and very robust parts. AM creates parts that are impossible to make by machining and eliminates the need for inventory as these parts can be printed on demand. This sets the stage for real-time intelligent manufacturing known as Industry 4.0. AM is clearly a disruptive technology that cries out for a new business model.

Jim van Oss started as an engineer at Moog and eventually became CIO. Jim’s now responsible for Moog’s Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) strategy, design, architecture, and deployment. Two years ago, I had a conversation with him about the potential of AM and Blockchain technologies at Moog. When we talked, I was not yet aware of the point-of-use, time-of-need Veripart™ supply chain business model, evolving at Moog. The vision of ordering single or printed parts from a trust-based marketplace came about by trying to solve the following scenario.

 

Imagine a scenario where lives depend upon a mission being flown off the deck of an aircraft carrier far out at sea. The only available aircraft has just been grounded with a failed critical part. There is no part inventory on the carrier. But we do have a 3d printer and a stock of powder aboard.

A technical data package is available for the part, and a replacement is quickly printed.You are the responsible person who needs to get this part quickly fitted to the aircraft and to sign the plane off as safe and ready to fly. How would you know if the newly printed AM part you are holding in your hand is good for use? 

Blockchain Technology

Blockchain helps solve some of the challenges that come with distributed 3D printing of parts, such as providing the provenance of parts and recording state during steps in the lifecycle. Blockchain can also help ensure that files have not been intercepted and corrupted during transmission to the remote printer site.

A separate company, Veritx, was formed to extend the blockchain capability to other companies. Moog’s Veripart process was the first to one licensed by Veritx. In March of 2019, Moog, along with the US military, demonstrated the capabilities of VeriPart at each of five demonstration sites. They tested counterfeit mitigation, smart contract execution, part provenance to validate the process/build integrity and ledger auditability, followed by a build analysis against the design.